Long-term outcomes with emicizumab in hemophilia A without inhibitors: results from the HAVEN 3 and 4 studies.

Background: Emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody, bridges activated factor (F) IX and FX, mimicking the function of missing or deficient activated FVIII in people with hemophilia A (HA). Objectives: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis in people with HA without FVIII inhibitors in the HAVEN 3 and 4 studies. Methods: HAVEN 3 and 4 were phase 3 open-label studies. Participants received emicizumab maintenance doses of 1.5 mg/kg every week or 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (HAVEN 3), or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks (HAVEN 4). Long-term efficacy and safety were assessed. Results: A total of 151 and 40 individuals without FVIII inhibitors received emicizumab in HAVEN 3 and 4, respectively. At the last patient, last visit dates (May 12, 2022 [HAVEN 3] and June 29, 2022 [HAVEN 4]), the median (range) duration of emicizumab exposure across the 2 studies was 248.1 (6.1-287.1) weeks. The mean (95% CI) annualized bleed rate for treated bleeds was 2.0 (0.23-7.15) for weeks 1 to 24, decreasing to 0.9 (0.01-5.28) by weeks 217 to 240. Overall, 188 (98.4%) participants experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE), with 185 treatment-related AEs in 71 (37.2%) participants. Forty-four (23.0%) participants reported a serious AE. Two thromboembolic events were reported, which were deemed unrelated to emicizumab by the investigator. No thrombotic microangiopathies were reported. Conclusion: With nearly 5 years of emicizumab exposure across the HAVEN 3 and 4 studies in people with HA without inhibitors, these data indicate continued bleed control with no new safety signals observed during long-term follow-up.

Disease Burden, Clinical Outcomes, and Quality of Life in People with Hemophilia A without Inhibitors in Europe: Analyses from CHESS II/CHESS PAEDs.

Introduction Limited data relating to treatment burden, quality of life, and mental health burden of hemophilia A (HA) are currently available. Aim To provide a comprehensive overview of unmet needs in people with HA (PwHA) using data generated from the Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey-II (CHESS II) and CHESS in the pediatric population (CHESS PAEDs) studies. Methods CHESS II and CHESS PAEDs are cross-sectional surveys of European males with HA or hemophilia B (HB) aged ≥18 and ≤17 years, respectively. Participants with FVIII inhibitors, mild HA, or HB were excluded from this analysis, plus those aged 18 to 19 years. Annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), target joints, and other patient-reported outcomes were evaluated. Results Overall, 468 and 691 PwHA with available data for the outcomes of interest were stratified by hemophilia severity and treatment regimen in CHESS II and CHESS PAEDs, respectively. In these studies, 173 (37.0%) and 468 (67.7%) participants received FVIII prophylaxis, respectively; no participants received the FVIII mimetic emicizumab or gene therapy. ABRs of 2.38 to 4.88 were reported across disease severity and treatment subgroups in both studies. Target joints were present in 35.7 and 16.6% of participants in CHESS II and CHESS PAEDS; 43.8 and 23.0% had problem joints. Chronic pain was reported by a large proportion of PwHA (73.9% in CHESS II; 58.8% in CHESS PAEDs). Participants also reported low EQ-5D scores (compared with people without HA), anxiety, depression, and negative impacts on their lifestyles due to HA. Conclusions These analyses suggest significant physical, social, and mental burdens of HA, irrespective of disease severity. Optimization of prophylactic treatment could help reduce the burden of HA on patients.

Current and emerging gene therapies for haemophilia A and B.

INTRODUCTION: After decades of stumbling clinical development, the first gene therapies for haemophilia A and B have been commercialized and have normalized factor (F)VIII and factor (F)IX levels in some individuals in the long term. Several other clinical programs testing adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector gene therapy are at various stages of clinical testing. DISCUSSION: Multiyear follow-up in phase 1/2 and 3 studies showed long-term and sometimes curative but widely variable and unpredictable efficacy. Liver toxicities, mostly low-grade, occur in the 1st year in at least some individuals in all haemophilia A and B trials and are poorly understood. Wide variability and unpredictability of outcome and slow decline of FVIII levels are a major disadvantage because immune responses to AAV vectors preclude repeat dosing, which otherwise could improve suboptimal or restore declining expression, while overexpression may predispose to thrombosis. Long-term safety outcomes will need lifelong monitoring because AAV vectors infused at high doses integrate into chromosomes at rates that raise questions about potential oncogenicity and necessitate vigilance. Alternative gene transfer systems employing gene editing and/or non-viral vectors are under development and promise to overcome some limitations of the current state of the art for both haemophilia A and B. CONCLUSIONS: AAV gene therapies for haemophilia have now become new treatment options but not universal cures. AAV is a powerful but imperfect gene transfer platform. Biobetter FVIII transgenes may help solve some problems plaguing gene therapy for haemophilia A. Addressing variability and unpredictability of efficacy, and delivery of gene therapy to ineligible patient subgroups may require different gene transfer systems, most of which are not ready for clinical translation yet but bring innovations needed to overcome the current limitations of gene therapy.

Recommendations for a minimum data set for monitoring gene therapy in hemophilia: communication from the ISTH SSC Working Group on Gene Therapy.

Independent data collection is crucial in addressing the challenges associated with gene therapy for hemophilia, which is a promising treatment option but requires careful monitoring and management of short-term and potential long-term safety concerns. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis has identified a minimum efficacy and safety data set included in the World Federation of Hemophilia Gene Therapy Registry that should be collected on a national basis at specific time points for each patient who has been treated with the gene therapy products. This Gene Therapy Minimum Data Set (GT-MDS) was developed to facilitate data collection and to ensure capturing the most relevant data and most known and unknown safety and efficacy parameters recently cited by the European Medicine Agencies. The concept of assembling a minimum data set is not about creating a new data set but rather about identifying a subset of critical and essential topics that should always be included. The GT-MDS is structured into 3 sections and comprises an abridged list of 6 topics during routine gene therapy follow-up, keeping the number of data points low but allowing for rapid and independent data evaluation. The World Federation of Hemophilia Gene Therapy Registry data set, developed by the World Federation of Hemophilia, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, and other organizations, including industry partners in 2020, is comprehensive. The GT-MDS reports the minimum relevant information that should not be lost and is mandatory to be collected for all patients who undergo gene therapy. Therefore, the implementation of the gene therapy registry and the minimum data set empowers and enhances data collection at a global level.

Evaluation of collagen turnover biomarkers as an objective measure for efficacy of treatment with rurioctocog alfa pegol in patients with hemophilia A: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hemophilia who have recurrent hemarthroses develop hemophilic arthropathy (HA). Regular prophylaxis with factor (F) VIII (FVIII) can reduce HA, but there is a need for objective outcome measures to evaluate treatment efficacy. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate and assess collagen turnover biomarkers in patients with hemophilia A to determine the efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment and understand their potential as tools for guiding treatment decisions and monitoring outcomes. METHODS: Joint remodeling was assessed by analyzing serum levels of collagen remodeling products at baseline and months 3, 6, 9, and 12 in a 98 patient subset receiving pharmacokinetics-guided prophylaxis with rurioctocog alfa pegol, targeting FVIII trough levels of 1 to 3 International Units (IU)/dL or 8 to 12 IU/dL (PROPEL study, NCT0285960). RESULTS: Basement membrane metabolism-related type 4 collagen remodeling products (C4M and PRO-C4) decreased after 3 months at all time points by up to 25% at 1 to 3 IU/dL (P = .049, P < .0001) and 8 to 12 IU/dL FVIII trough levels (P = .0002, P < .0001). Interstitial tissue metabolism-related type 3 (C3M) and 5 (PRO-C5) collagen remodeling products decreased after 3 months, by up to 19% at 1 to 3 IU/dL FVIII trough level (P = .0001, P = .009) and 23% at 8 to 12 IU/dL FVIII trough level (P = .0002, P = .001). An increase of up to 12% was seen for cartilage metabolism-related type 2 collagen product (PRO-C2, not C2M) after 6 months at both trough levels (P = .01, P = .005). When stratified by prior treatment, changes in C3M (P = .03) and C4M (P = .02) levels were observed between trough levels for prior on-demand treatment but not for prophylaxis prior to study entry. CONCLUSION: Joint improvement measured by collagen remodeling biomarkers specific to the basement membrane, interstitial matrix, and cartilage was seen with pharmacokinetics-guided prophylaxis. These collagen remodeling biomarkers warrant further exploration as biomarkers to guide treatment toward improvement in HA.

A new population pharmacokinetic model for recombinant factor IX-Fc fusion concentrate including young children with haemophilia B.

AIMS: Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIX-Fc) is an extended half-life factor concentrate administered to haemophilia B patients. So far, a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model has only been published for patients aged ≥12 years. The aim was to externally evaluate the predictive performance of the published rFIX-Fc population PK model for patients of all ages and develop a model that describes rFIX-Fc PK using real-world data. METHODS: We collected prospective and retrospective data from patients with haemophilia B treated with rFIX-Fc and included in the OPTI-CLOT TARGET study (NTR7523) or United Kindom (UK)-EHL Outcomes Registry (NCT02938156). Predictive performance was assessed by comparing predicted with observed FIX activity levels. A new population PK model was constructed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. RESULTS: Real-world data were obtained from 37 patients (median age: 16 years, range 2-71) of whom 14 were aged <12 years. Observed FIX activity levels were significantly higher than levels predicted using the published model, with a median prediction error of -48.8%. The new model showed a lower median prediction error (3.4%) and better described rFIX-Fc PK, especially for children aged <12 years. In the new model, an increase in age was correlated with a decrease in clearance (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The published population PK model significantly underpredicted FIX activity levels. The new model better describes rFIX-Fc PK, especially for children aged <12 years. This study underlines the necessity to strive for representative population PK models, thereby avoiding extrapolation outside the studied population.

FRONTIER1: a partially randomized phase 2 study assessing the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of Mim8, a factor VIIIa mimetic.

BACKGROUND: Mim8 (denecimig) is a factor VIII (FVIII) mimetic bispecific antibody in development for the treatment of hemophilia. Data from the phase 1 part of FRONTIER1 (EudraCT: 2019-000465-20, NCT04204408, and NN7769-4513) suggested that Mim8 was well tolerated in healthy participants and exhibited pharmacokinetic (PK) properties consistent with dose proportionality. OBJECTIVES: The partially randomized, phase 2, multiple ascending dose (MAD) part of FRONTIER1 aimed to evaluate the safety, PK, pharmacodynamics (PD), and exploratory efficacy of Mim8 in participants with hemophilia A with or without FVIII inhibitors. METHODS: The MAD part of FRONTIER1 consisted of 42 participants, assigned to 5 cohorts, with participants in cohorts 3 and 4 randomized 1:1 to dosing weekly or every 4 weeks, respectively. Four of the 42 participants (9.5%) had FVIII inhibitors prior to study enrolment. The primary endpoint was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). PK and PD were evaluated by Mim8 plasma concentration and thrombin generation, respectively. Exploratory efficacy was assessed via the number of treated bleeds. Safety and PD parameters were also evaluated from an exploratory cohort treated with emicizumab. RESULTS: Mim8 was well tolerated, with 1 serious TEAE (anxiety-related chest pain) deemed unrelated to Mim8. There was no dose dependency on the number, causality, type, or severity of TEAEs. PK/PD properties supported weekly to monthly dosing approaches, and few participants experienced treated bleeds beyond the lowest dose cohort (1 in cohorts 2 and 3, and 3 in cohort 5). CONCLUSION: These data support the continued clinical development of Mim8, and FRONTIER1 has proceeded onto an extension phase.

Using theory of change to co-create a programme theory for a telerehabilitation intervention for pain management in people with haemophilia.

BACKGROUND: Improved approaches for chronic pain management are a clinical and research priority for people with haemophilia (PWH). Involving people with lived experience in the design of a complex rehabilitation intervention strengthens the credibility and plausibility of the intervention, particularly in relation to rare disorders. Here we describe using a 'Theory of Change' (ToC) dialogue-based stakeholder process to create a programme theory for a telerehabilitation intervention. METHODS: An online workshop was convened and stakeholders received a briefing document in advance. Five stakeholders took part (3 PWH and 2 physiotherapists). At the workshop the group first agreed the overall aim of the intervention. Discussions then identified the resources, activities, barriers and enablers needed to achieve this outcome. All discussions were recorded and annotated by the workshop moderator. Behaviour change techniques were mapped for inclusion in the theory. RESULTS: A programme theory and narrative report were produced. All stakeholders reviewed these for clarity and to ensure a true reflection of the workshop discussions. Agreement was based on how meaningful, well-defined, do-able, plausible, credible, and testable each component was. Stakeholders highlighted the importance of issues unique to PWH. Key components included the need for physiotherapists to be knowledgeable of the condition, a range of exercises that were inclusive of all abilities, and the need for people to feel safe and supported whilst taking part. CONCLUSIONS: Co-developed theory based approaches to intervention design offer an inclusive and transparent way to develop novel and meaningful interventions for people with complex health conditions. The ToC is wholly transparent in its design and content. Together with the identified behaviour change techniques, the theory informs the protocol for a feasibility study evaluating a telerehabilitation intervention. Importantly, it allows the opportunity to revise, adapt and improve the programme theory for further implementation and evaluation.

Cases of less-than-expected FVIII activity in previously treated patients during post-marketing surveillance of N8-GP.

INTRODUCTION: Turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP) is a glycoPEGylated, extended half-life (EHL), human recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) approved for the treatment and prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A. Since its launch in August 2019, > 800 patients have been treated worldwide. AIM: To present data from identified post-marketing cases of less-than-expected FVIII activity in previously treated patients (PTPs) without inhibitors after switching to N8-GP. METHODS: The post-marketing safety database was searched using keywords such as 'coagulation FVIII level decreased'. Identified cases reported prior to 13 October 2021 were included in this report. Cases in which patients had FVIII inhibitors were excluded. RESULTS: Here we report 14 cases of less-than-expected FVIII activity. Details varied greatly amongst the cases. At presentation, FVIII activity ranged from 1% (15 min post-dose) to 51% (2 days post-dose). Seven patients experienced bleeding episodes after switching to N8-GP with heterogeneity in bleeding presentations. Six out of seven patients who were tested for anti-PEG IgG and/or IgM antibodies were positive. In all known cases, FVIII activity returned to the expected range when switched to an alternative FVIII replacement product. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the 14 reported cases of less-than-expected FVIII activity, without presence of detectable FVIII inhibitors, presented with heterogenous characteristics, and wide variations in FVIII activity and anti-PEG antibody titre. FVIII activity returned to the expected range after switching to alternative FVIII products. In line with WFH guidelines, monitoring of FVIII activity can ensure FVIII activity in the expected range. The safety surveillance of N8-GP continues.

Nebulized Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator (rt-PA) for Acute COVID-19-Induced Respiratory Failure: An Exploratory Proof-of-Concept Trial.

Acute lung injury in COVID-19 results in diffuse alveolar damage with disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier, coagulation activation, alveolar fibrin deposition and pulmonary capillary thrombi. Nebulized recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) has the potential to facilitate localized thrombolysis in the alveolar compartment and improve oxygenation. In this proof-of-concept safety study, adults with COVID-19-induced respiratory failure and a <300 mmHg PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) received nebulized rt-PA in two cohorts (C1 and C2), alongside standard of care, between 23 April-30 July 2020 and 21 January-19 February 2021, respectively. Matched historical controls (MHC; n = 18) were used in C1 to explore efficacy. Safety co-primary endpoints were treatment-related bleeds and <1.0-1.5 g/L fibrinogen reduction. A variable dosing strategy with clinical efficacy endpoint and minimal safety concerns was determined in C1 for use in C2; patients were stratified by ventilation type to receive 40-60 mg rt-PA daily for ≤14 days. Nine patients in C1 (IMV, 6/9; NIRS, 3/9) and 26 in C2 (IMV, 12/26; NIRS, 14/26) received nebulized rt-PA for a mean (SD) of 6.7 (4.6) and 9.1(4.6) days, respectively. Four bleeds (one severe, three mild) in three patients were considered treatment related. There were no significant fibrinogen reductions. Greater improvements in mean P/F ratio from baseline to study end were observed in C1 compared with MHC (C1; 154 to 299 vs. MHC; 154 to 212). In C2, there was no difference in the baseline P/F ratio of NIRS and IMV patients. However, a larger improvement in the P/F ratio occurred in NIRS patients (NIRS; 126 to 240 vs. IMV; 120 to 188) and fewer treatment days were required (NIRS; 7.86 vs. IMV; 10.5). Nebulized rt-PA appears to be well-tolerated, with a trend towards improved oxygenation, particularly in the NIRS group. Randomized clinical trials are required to demonstrate the clinical effect significance and magnitude.

Targeting an elevated FVIII level using personalized rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis in specific patient populations with hemophilia A: post hoc subanalysis of the randomized, phase 3 PROPEL study.

Background: The phase 3, prospective PROPEL study demonstrated that pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided prophylaxis targeting elevated factor VIII (FVIII) troughs in patients with hemophilia A resulted in lower annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) and a higher proportion of patients experiencing zero bleeds in the second 6 months of treatment when targeting a FVIII trough of 8-12% versus 1-3%. Objective: To investigate the benefit of PK-guided prophylaxis with rurioctocog alfa pegol targeting two FVIII trough levels in specific patient subgroups in a post hoc analysis using data from PROPEL. Design: This is a post hoc analysis of data from the PROPEL study. The design and primary outcomes of the prospective, randomized PROPEL study (NCT02585960) have been reported previously. Methods: This post hoc analysis reports data stratified by FVIII half-life (t1/2), hemophilic arthropathy status, number of target joints at screening, previous treatment regimen, and ABR range in the 12 months before study entry. Results: Targeting an elevated FVIII trough of 8-12% was associated with higher average FVIII levels over time, regardless of FVIII t1/2 at baseline. The decrease in total ABR between the 8-12% and 1-3% arms was greatest in patients with a FVIII t1/2 of 6 to <12 h (0.7 versus 3.5); a higher number of target joints, that is, at least four target joints, at baseline (0.2 versus 1.6); the presence of arthropathy (0.1 versus 1.7); and those previously treated on-demand (0.3 versus 1.8). Conclusion: These results support the feasibility of targeting elevated FVIII levels using personalized rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis. These benefits may be especially important in patients with a short FVIII t1/2 and those receiving standard prophylaxis with frequent breakthrough bleeds, arthropathy, and target joints. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02585960; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02585960.

The humanistic and economic burden of problem joints for children and adults with moderate or severe haemophilia A: Analysis of the CHESS population studies.

INTRODUCTION: Adequate prophylactic treatment and physical activity improve joint health and clinical outcomes for people with haemophilia A (HA). However, non-clinical joint-related burden of moderate (MHA) and severe (SHA) HA has not been well characterised. AIM: To quantify the joint health-related humanistic and economic burden of MHA and SHA in Europe. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the cross-sectional CHESS population studies using a patient-centric measure of joint health (problem joints, PJs: chronic joint pain and/or limited range of movement due to compromised joint integrity with or without persistent bleeding) was conducted. Descriptive statistics summarised health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity/activity impairment and costs by number of PJs (0, 1 or ≥2) and HA severity. RESULTS: A total of 1171 patients were included from CHESS-II (n = 468) and CHESS-PAEDs (n = 703). In both studies, 41 and 59% of patients had MHA and SHA, respectively. Prevalence of ≥2 PJs was similar with MHA and SHA (CHESS-II: 23 and 26%; CHESS-PAEDs: 4 and 3%, respectively). HRQoL was worse with an increasing number of PJs (CHESS-II: .81 vs. .66 with 0 and ≥2 PJs, respectively, for MHA; .79 vs. .51 for SHA; CHESS-PAEDs: .64 vs. .26 and .72 vs. .14). Total costs increased with increasing PJs regardless of severity in CHESS-II (€2923 vs. €22,536 with 0 and ≥2 PJs, respectively, for MHA; €11,022 vs. €27,098 for SHA) and CHESS-PAEDs (€6222 vs. €11,043 for MHA; €4457 vs. €14,039 for SHA). CONCLUSION: Presence of PJs was associated with a substantial humanistic and economic burden on patients with MHA or SHA across the lifespan.

Emicizumab prophylaxis in haemophilia A with inhibitors: Three years follow-up from the UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO).

INTRODUCTION: The UK National Haemophilia Database (NHD) collects data from all UK persons with haemophilia A with inhibitors (PwHA-I). It is well-placed to investigate patient selection, clinical outcomes, drug safety and other issues not addressed in clinical trials of emicizumab. AIMS: To determine safety, bleeding outcomes and early effects on joint health of emicizumab prophylaxis in a large, unselected cohort using national registry and patient reported Haemtrack (HT) data between 01 January 2018 and 30 September 2021. METHODS: Prospectively collected bleeding outcomes were analysed in people with ≥6 months emicizumab HT data and compared with previous treatment if available. Change in paired Haemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS) were analysed in a subgroup. Adverse events (AEs) reports were collected and adjudicated centrally. RESULTS: This analysis includes 117 PwHA-I. Mean annualised bleeding rate (ABR) was .32 (95% CI, .18; .39) over a median 42 months treatment with emicizumab. Within-person comparison (n = 74) demonstrated an 89% reduction in ABR after switching to emicizumab and an increase in zero treated bleed rate from 45 to 88% (p < .01). In a subgroup of 37 people, total HJHS improved in 36%, remained stable in 46% and deteriorated in 18%, with a median (IQR) within-person change of -2.0 (-9, 1.5) (p = .04). Three arterial thrombotic events were reported, two possibly drug related. Other AEs were generally non-severe and usually limited to early treatment, included cutaneous reactions (3.6%), headaches (1.4%), nausea (2.8%) and arthralgia (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Emicizumab prophylaxis is associated with sustained low bleeding rates and was generally well-tolerated in people with haemophilia A and inhibitors.

Efanesoctocog Alfa Prophylaxis for Patients with Severe Hemophilia A.

BACKGROUND: Efanesoctocog alfa provides high sustained factor VIII activity by overcoming the von Willebrand factor-imposed half-life ceiling. The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of efanesoctocog alfa for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A are unclear. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3 study involving patients 12 years of age or older with severe hemophilia A. In group A, patients received once-weekly prophylaxis with efanesoctocog alfa (50 IU per kilogram of body weight) for 52 weeks. In group B, patients received on-demand treatment with efanesoctocog alfa for 26 weeks, followed by once-weekly prophylaxis with efanesoctocog alfa for 26 weeks. The primary end point was the mean annualized bleeding rate in group A; the key secondary end point was an intrapatient comparison of the annualized bleeding rate during prophylaxis in group A with the rate during prestudy factor VIII prophylaxis. Additional end points included treatment of bleeding episodes, safety, pharmacokinetics, and changes in physical health, pain, and joint health. RESULTS: In group A (133 patients), the median annualized bleeding rate was 0 (interquartile range, 0 to 1.04), and the estimated mean annualized bleeding rate was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.97). The mean annualized bleeding rate decreased from 2.96 (95% CI, 2.00 to 4.37) to 0.69 (95% CI, 0.43 to 1.11), a finding that showed superiority over prestudy factor VIII prophylaxis (P<0.001). A total of 26 patients were enrolled in group B. In the overall population, nearly all bleeding episodes (97%) resolved with one injection of efanesoctocog alfa. Weekly prophylaxis with efanesoctocog alfa provided mean factor VIII activity of more than 40 IU per deciliter for the majority of the week and of 15 IU per deciliter at day 7. Prophylaxis with efanesoctocog alfa for 52 weeks (group A) improved physical health (P<0.001), pain intensity (P = 0.03), and joint health (P = 0.01). In the overall study population, efanesoctocog alfa had an acceptable side-effect profile, and the development of inhibitors to factor VIII was not detected. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe hemophilia A, once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa provided superior bleeding prevention to prestudy prophylaxis, normal to near-normal factor VIII activity, and improvements in physical health, pain, and joint health. (Funded by Sanofi and Sobi; XTEND-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04161495.).

Emicizumab in people with moderate or mild haemophilia A (HAVEN 6): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial data are scarce for the use of prophylaxis in people with non-severe haemophilia A. The HAVEN 6 study aims to assess safety and efficacy of emicizumab prophylaxis in people with non-severe haemophilia A without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. METHODS: HAVEN 6 is a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study taking place in 22 specialty clinics and hospitals in Europe, North America, and South Africa. Eligible participants were people of all ages weighing at least 3 kg with a diagnosis of moderate (FVIII activity ≥1%-≤5%) or mild (FVIII >5%-<40%) haemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors requiring prophylaxis as assessed by the treating physician. Participants received subcutaneous emicizumab 3 mg/kg of bodyweight once weekly for 4 weeks, followed by the participant's choice of maintenance dose: 1·5 mg/kg once weekly, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Safety was the primary objective of the study. Safety endpoints included adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events of special interest including thromboembolic events and thrombotic microangiopathies. The primary efficacy endpoint was the annualised bleed rate for treated bleeds. Analyses were done for participants who received at least one dose of emicizumab. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04158648, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Feb 10, 2020, and Aug 31, 2021, we assigned 73 people to treatment. 72 participants received at least one dose of emicizumab (51 moderate [71%]; 21 mild [29%]; 69 male [96%]; three female [4%]; and 61 White [85%]). Median age was 23·5 years (IQR 12·0-36·0); median follow-up was 55·6 weeks (IQR 52·3-61·6) weeks. At baseline, 24 participants (33%) had target joints and 37 (51%) were receiving FVIII prophylaxis. 60 participants (83%) had at least one adverse event; the most common adverse events were headache (in 12 participants [17%]), injection-site reaction (12 [17%]), and arthralgia (11 [15%]). 15 (21%) had at least one emicizumab-related adverse event; no adverse events led to treatment withdrawal, modification, or interruption. Eight participants (11%) reported ten serious adverse events in total, none emicizumab-related. There were no deaths or thrombotic microangiopathies. One participant had grade 1 thrombosed haemorrhoids (classified as a thromboembolic event), unrelated to emicizumab. The annualised bleed rate was 0·9 (95% CI 0·55-1·52) for treated bleeds. 48 participants (67%) had no treated bleeds. All-bleed annualised bleed rates were 10·1 (95% CI 6·93-14·76) from 24 weeks pre-study and 2·3 (1·67-3·12) on-study after a median follow-up of 55·6 weeks. INTERPRETATION: These data show efficacy and a favourable safety profile of emicizumab in people with non-severe haemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors who warrant prophylaxis, confirming emicizumab as a valuable treatment option in this population. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Increased risk of dialysis circuit clotting in hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 is associated with elevated FVIII, fibrinogen and D-dimers.

INTRODUCTION: Severe COVID-19 infections increase the risk of thrombotic events and Intensive Care Units reported increased extracorporeal circuit clotting (ECC) in COVID-19 patients with acute kidney injury. We wished to determine whether hemodialysis (HD) patients with COVID-19 also have increased risk of circuit clotting. METHODS: We reviewed coagulation studies and HD records, 4 weeks before and after COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction detection in HD patients between April 2020 and June 2021. FINDINGS: Sixty-eight (33.5%) of 203 HD patients with COVID-19, 65% male, mean age 64.9 ± 15.3 years, experienced some circuit clotting, and no clotting recorded prior to positive test results. In those who experienced ECC, prothrombin, activated partial thromboplastin or thrombin times were not different, whereas median factor VIII (273 [168-419] vs. 166 [139-225] IU/dl, p < 0.001), D-dimers (2654 [1381-6019] vs. 1351 [786-2334] ng/ml, p < 0.05), and fibrinogen (5.6 ± 1.4 vs. 4.9 ± 1.4 g/L, p < 0.05) were greater. Antithrombin (94 [83-112] vs. 89 [84-103] IU/dl), protein C (102 [80-130] vs. 86 [76-106] IU/dl), protein S (65 [61-75] vs. 65 [52-79] IU/dl) and platelet counts (193 [138-243] vs. 174 [138-229] × 109 /L) did not differ. On multivariable logistic analysis, circuit clotting was associated with log factor VIII (odds ratio [OR] 14.8 (95% confidence limits [95% CL] 1.12-19.6), p = 0.041), fibrinogen (OR 1.57 [95% CL 1.14-21.7], p = 0.006) and log D dimer (OR 4.8 [95% CL 1.16-12.5], p = 0.028). DISCUSSION: Extracorporeal circuit clotting was increased within 4 weeks of testing positive for COVID-19. Clotting was associated with increased factor VIII, fibrinogen and D-dimer, suggesting that the risk of circuit clotting was related to the inflammatory response to COVID-19.